I Exist Voices from the Lesbian Gay Middle Eastern Community

Gay and lesbians of Middle Eastern region who reside in the United States often battle the contradictory stereotypes considering their sexuality and their race. As Muslims, Christians and Jews, From Armenia, Syria, Iran, Egypt, Lebanon and Sudan, they have all labored to accept themselves and the sexuality regardless of the risk of condemnation of family and friends. This award-winning movie characteristics meetings with a kind of juvenile men, women and their families who share with viewers some of the knowledge, delights and sorrows of this varied community. Timely and groundbreaking I Exist presents voice to an assembly that has long stayed quiet out of disgrace and fear.

Gay persons live in Armenia, Syria, Iran, Egypt and Sudan too. They are Christians, Muslims and Jews, belonging to and turned down by their own cultures. In this sequence of interview we discover a bit about their inhabits and discover a couple of critiques of western newspapers and its oversimplified, often contradictory portrayals of these peoples and cultures.

I Exist is a 56-minute documentary discovering one-by-one excursions of Lesbian and Gay persons of Middle Eastern heritage dwelling in the United States.

The heritage and devout trials that numerous Lesbian and Gay Middle Eastern persons tolerate are unparalleled. This documentary displays the excursion numerous take in discovering how to connect both their heritage and gender identity.

Even with these trials, tales of wish appear and display that a familys love can habitually win over abhorrence and ignorance

In a sequence of emotional meetings, queers of Middle Eastern source disclose how much they have in widespread in spite of deep heritage and devout differences.

Movie Overview

The nineteen year old Kingsley has been ravaged by strange dreams throughout her life. Part of the dream comprises a smiling cat and a blue-colored caterpillar. One morning, Kingsley and her mother take a journey to the upcountry to attend a party and this happens while the dreams are still fresh in Kingsley. At the party, Alice is supposed to agree to a marriage proposal from a family friend who is expected to suppress her independent spirit. Although the party commences and the proposal is made, Alice is shocked and thus disappears into the woods where she unbelievably falls down the rabbit hole. While at the bottom of the hole, Alice is subjected to her usual behaviors which she typically experiences in her normal day-to-day life. Alice drinks, eats, and reduces in size and grows and finally passes through the small door to Wonderland. The paper is an attempt to critique the film with background knowledge of Tim Burton, who directs the film.

Critical Analysis of the Movie
Tim Burton effectively makes use of the recent 3-D explosion to incorporate animation that helps in development of the fantasy adventure which is the idea behind the entire film. Nevertheless, the 3-D aspect is carefully and strategically intermarried with live action but does not employ motion capture. In addition, the film takes a unique position in Tim Burtons typical productions as this stands to be the first works filmed on green screen. This type of filming is referred to as Chroma key compositing and it can always prove very excruciating on the part of the actors as the actors are forced to endure long periods of exposure to the green color. This should have been counteracted by fitting lavender lenses. Nevertheless, such a feature was essential for the sake of achieving the desired characteristics of the film like distorted features such as increasing Red Queens head to the desired size.

The 3-D animation in the film is superbly executed even though the climax of effective usage is realized in the pre-Wonderland segment which is set in the Victorian high society. The 3-D depicting a look down an eagerly standing crowd waiting to witness Alice as she agrees to a marriage proposal is a good fete of the 3-D animation in the film. There is a gradual attenuation of the 3-D effects in this film which achieves effectiveness better than previously done works such as Avatar by James Cameron. However, the animations still experience problems as at sometime in the course of the cast, the background is thrown out of focus.

The theme and features within the plot development of the film exhibit a continued feature that Burton has centered on in his career. It is typical for Tim Burton to incorporate metamorphosis of characters into bizarre creatures in his productions. Look at the Red Queen and her head. This keenly takes after the Beetle Juice, where we encounter a smiling skull on top of Beetle Juices head. Tims career as animator which saw its long time at Disney is therefore clearly revealed in most of his film including Alice in Wonderland.

Another characteristic that clearly identifies itself with Burton and which comprises a better part of the film is fantasy. Tim Burton typically incorporates fantasy aspects in his films. The entire film is a fantasy adventure. In most of his previous productions, also one feature that could be drawn from his works is the centering of plot development around a misunderstood outcast. Keeping the original characters also helps the film in achieving the classic luster that is complemented by a darkly shone background and heavily epithetic character identification. For instance, heavy names like the Caterpillar, White Rabbit among others are an immense depiction of the characters in the original stories.

Conclusion
The establishment of the film as Burtons work is evident from the renditions of the classic characters. Even though this feature also makes the settings of the film as close as possible to the original settings in the mother tale, it also portrays Burtons inclination toward a classic appreciation with classic characters making up most of his works. And when he combines it with Johnny Depps efforts to achieve the same, the results are even more outstanding. In spite of Burtons dire strive to maintain the original setting of the story, his usual luster of classics environment and fantasy is complemented by the dark scenes in the film. This is part of his uniqueness and identity.

In conclusion, Tim Burtons Alice in Wonderland is a good show of creativity and maintenance of established personal tradition though with a detour into 3-D model of casting. Even though there are some gaps especially with the 3-D part and other minor places, Alice in Wonderland clearly identifies itself with Tim Burton.
The films The Cheat (1915) and Broken Blossom (1919) are two notable films in the early 1900s. Both films have acclaimed performances and presentations, which made them popular even almost a century after they were produced. However, although these are highly praised by many critics, there are also some issues that they have faced, especially on the matter of discrimination.

The Cheat is a film about a woman named Edith Hardy who invested Red Cross charity funds to Wall Street to support her lavish lifestyle and caprices. However, she lost all the money that she invested and to be able to pay back, she turned to a Japanese trader named Tori, whom she was able to persuade by flirting. In exchange for the money she borrowed, she agreed to a tryst. But then, her husbands hard work paid off and they finally had the money to pay for her debts. She tried to break up her agreement with Tori by telling him that she would just pay the amount she borrowed but the latter did not agree. Her persistence annoyed him and as a result, he branded her on the shoulder to show that she already was his property. She reacted by shooting him and left. Her husband, however, did not want her to be humiliated so he confessed to the crime. Then again, during the trial, Edith chose to admit that she was the one who really shot Tori and showed the jury of the branding made on her. Thus, instead of Edith being persecuted, the all-white jury turned the blame on the Japanese, who did humiliate a white woman.

On the other hand, Broken Blossom is a film about a native Chinese named Cheng Huan who left his native land in pursuit of sharing the message of Buddha to the Anglo-Saxon lands. His idealism began to fade as he witnessed the brutality that is happening in the inner city of London. In his quest, he met Lucy, a young girl often beaten by her father. Lucy found refuge in Chengs home, one day as she was escaping from her fathers beatings. As she was nursed by Cheng, they formed a very strong bond that connected them deeply. However, things became complicated when Lucys father found her and forced her to get back to their house. This incident led Lucy to lock herself in the closet to avoid her fathers wrath. When Cheng arrived to rescue her, it was too late. The two guys fought and later on, Cheng shot Lucys father with a gun repeatedly. He went back to his home with Lucys body and built a shrine for Buddha before claiming his own life by stabbing his stomach with a knife.

If we try to compare the two Asian characters in the film, we can say that the first one, Tori was made a villain while Cheng was a protagonist. The irony here is that, Tori was an actual Asian, he was a Japanese but the actor who played Cheng was actually a Caucasian in real life. If we analyze it, it would seem unfair for an Asian character to be played by a person with a nationality other than Asian, however, if we dig deeper, we will see the reasons and consequences behind this.

Initially, when I watched the film, I felt what most Asian viewers at this present time would feel. That is because, I am blinded by the issues that were of concern during the early 1900s. It is admirable that a real Asian a Japanese (Sessue Hayakawa), was able to portray Tori especially during those times because there was actually a real-life discrimination on Asians at that time. Although many critics admired the actor who played Tori for his wonderful portrayal of the character, the people from his homeland actually felt otherwise. In fact, they were so offended that they disclaimed him, his name was changed and his nationality was changed from Japanese to Burmese. They did not appreciate the fact that their race was condemned in a film the way it had happened and perhaps, was greatly embarrassed that someone accepted the role to portray such disgrace to them.

Cheng of Broken Blossom, on the other hand is being criticized because the character was played by a Caucasian (Richard Barthelmess). In the contemporary times, we would certainly feel insulted for the choice of character. Personally, I felt that way when watching the movie. However, as I have said earlier, the conditions of the times were different. Research has lead me to find that miscegenation was illegal during the time that the film was produced. Miscegenation is a relationship (perhaps a marriage or cohabitation) between different races. Both real life relationship and the portrayal of such relationship onscreen was unacceptable. Thus, even though we feel that it is not right, the director of the film had no choice at that time but to do what he did, to cast a Caucasian to play a minority role.

In watching these two films, we have seen the attempts of the two directors to incorporate Asians in their work. The first was able to cast an actual Asian, who eventually received the aversion of the people of his own race, while the other portrayed an Asian role but was played by another nationality. In both films, we would have different feelings towards the characters but as I have stated earlier, the conditions of the times played a great role in the mode of casting. We should be thankful that today, those considerations no longer applied for we have established that our culture is to be proud of. These two films should just serve as a reminder of the long struggles that many of our ancestors have gone through for us to be able to rise above the discrimination. We should just be glad that finally, we can have films that have Asian characters played by real Asians and that our race no longer make us the villains of films.

Anna May Wong

Anna May Wong is the first Asian American and Chinese American movie personality to become an international acting sensation. She had filmed a lot of award  winning movies and garnered for herself a spot in Entertainment because of her superb acting. Anna May Wong proves to be a legacy in the international movie industry.

Wong was born in Los Angeles, California, in one of the many Chinese communities that had thrived everywhere in the world. Growing up her interest and talent in acting were evident which is why she entered the world of movies. However, the beginning of her career as an actress was rather caged in the stereotypical and supporting roles. She was rather a boring and predictable actress whose appearance in the films she make does not excite the senses. Her roles and movies were too traditional that even before the public watches they already know what the ending will be like.

Wong herself was aware that majority of the roles she gets and will get will always be supporting or stereotypical. In my own observation, Wong is given roles like she had received because of her Chinese heritage. She is dominantly Chinese in terms of her features yellow skin, chinky eyes, small lips and slim body built.  It is difficult to advance in a foreign country especially in an industry where people have yet to open their eyes to the vast plurality of cultures that exist (during that time). Lead actors and actresses have to be Americans, the story should always revolve around them and they should be good looking, adhering to the standards of the traditional American concept of beauty. Shall there be an opportunity for foreigners (or to be more specific, Chinese in which case I would specifically refer to Anna May Wong) the role that will be given to her is supporting, a role that affirms the beauty and kindness of the lead actress and if there is anyone who needs to die or commit a crime to evoke more drama then the supporting actress must take that. One clear example is in Shanghai Express where Anna May Wong played the role of Hue Fei, a fellow courtesan. Note that in most reviews she is described as the fellow courtesan, not courtesan meaning that there is another courtesan who has more value and importance in the film, in such case it was Shanghai Lily played by Marlene Dietrich. She also stabbed Chang so that the lovers, Harvey and Shanghai Lily (also regarded Magdalen) can live happily ever after.

In other cases when supporting roles were not offered to Anna May Wong, she is usually offered roles that are of Chinese history, culture, story or anything Chinese. With her features and her talent she is the premiere choice of film producers for movies like A Trip to Chinatown and the Toll of the Sea. Her roles were very limited, as if she cannot film or act in a movie where the theme and plot is different. The challenges faced by Anna May Wong were racial related it cannot be denied that film makers and producers favor actors and actresses who are Americans instead of Asians regardless of the talent and skill to perform. In which case, Anna May Wong fled to Europe to discover further developments for herself in acting and the film industry. She was well aware that the United States is not yet ready to open larger opportunities for actresses like her. Producers and film makers are yet to have the creativity and courage to venture in films that are rather revolutionary and nontraditional in nature. So, Anna May Wong fled to Europe and it was through that big and brave decision that she was able to truly be an actress.

One of her most acclaimed and well known films is Daughter of Shanghai. Daughter of Shanghai was shown in 1937. I have both positive and negative commentaries about Daughter of Shanghai. It was a milestone in the life and career of Anna May Wong to get a movie like this because she is starred as a lead actress and in a rather different film. Although the film was filmed with very little budget, it managed to create an effect among the viewers because of its difference with respect to other films that were shown before. Finally, there is a movie where a heroine is not American, or at least on a more general note, an actress who was chosen to play the role of a heroine and was chosen without looking at her race only at her talent and ability to act.

Majority of people would say that the Daughter of Shanghai is the story of Anna May Wong herself. Lan Ying Lin, the character played by Anna May Wong and herself had various similarities. Probably one is their courage to take risks Lan Ying Lin set out to South America to find out who the villain of the story is. The Latin continent is something very unusual to her, she is not familiar with the people, the place itself, the lifestyle and she cannot even communicate with them in a language where both parties will be able to fully understand each other. But she was determined to pursue a mission that showcased her courage, her determination to achieve something no matter how different or how many obstacles there may be in the way. That same courage and that same determination Lan Ying Lin and Anna May Wong share with each other, Anna May Wong is a ChineseAmerican who is often judged by her race regardless of the obstructions that she had come across with and the many opportunities she missed because of racial discrimination, she continue to fight for her career and her craft as a human being and as an artist. That is the greatest and most significant similarity between the two that they have a dream and they are determined to do whatever it takes to make that dream materialize. Probably the reason why Anna May Wong regards this movie as her story is because of the fact that she had undergone and experienced the same difficulties as Lan Ying Lin, maybe not exactly but there are some symbolisms which I think are good points of contention.

First is the setting out of Lan Ying Lin to South America to find out who the villain is. In real life, this can be tantamount to Anna May Wong flying to Europe in search of better opportunities in her life and for her career. Both women were clueless of what awaits them, but they set aside their fears and took the risk. Another is when Lan Ying Lin was dressed as a male but was soon discovered to be a female and was stranded with sexually deprived men. In my own view, this is a representation of the difficulties that Anna May Wong had to go through as an actress. She had to wear different masks she had to be the person that the situation needs her to be. She always had to wear a smile in her face, especially when facing directors and movie makers. And in occasions when she would audition for a role that she would not get, she still has to wear that smile. To pretend that everything is okay and there are other opportunities that she would like to look forward to. The pack of sexually deprived men for me represent the passion of Anna May Wong to live, her gender is never an excuse for her to settle for anything, second it is not the people around her that determine her future but herself alone. (Note I am referring to personal interpretations, this citation is greatly limited to the event were she was trapped with men, not yet talking about when she was rescued.

But the critique I have about this movie is that it is not entirely revolutionary and liberating in nature. There were still some cultural and traditional beliefs that Western film makers are not yet ready to let go of. One example of which is that Lan Ying Lin had to be rescued by a man.  Unlike in the film Shanghai Express, Anna May Wong had a supporting role. A fellow courtesan to the lead actress Shanghai Lily, this time her role is a definitive character. The center of the story is her, which is why despite the low budget and difficulties she had gone through in making the movie, she still regards it as one of her best roles and best films ever created. Shanghai Express is her movie and even more, a movie which was made to match and fit her personality. In relation to the film Daughter of the Dragon, this film is different because she was highlighted more as a heroic daughter instead of a daughter who is closely and largely dependent on the father. Shanghai Express also speaks of independence, aside from all the many varied themes that it has.

The next movie I would like to explore is Lady from Chungking. This film was shown in 1942 and was one of the best in Anna May Wongs career. Personally, I view this film as the most significant film not only in Anna May Wongs career but most importantly in the recognition of the strength of women and Chinese people as a whole.  She played the role of an aristocratic Chinese woman who led a group of Chinese fighters against Japanese invaders. The catch about his film and the reason why it is very significant is because it highlights the capacity of women to lead, to fight and be victorious. Feminism has major impacts in the Chinese world and in the entertainment industry.

Let me mention though the first impact of this film on Feminism. We all know that China is a very conservative country. Not only its tradition but its way of life, history and literature tell us of how the Chinese world treats women. And for an army of Chinese fighters to be lead by a woman is something that holds great significance in itself. This means that they would like to showcase the capacity of women to participate in affairs that are of great contribution to the whole society. Somewhat, this film dissolves or suggests to dissolve the margin that hampers the growth of women in the society. The impact it has created to the Chinese world as a whole is also similar to the effects it gave on Feminism. The traditional Chinese understanding that women are for the private sphere (meaning the home) and have no valid contributions for the public sphere (the society) except for child birth is slowly but crisply being questioned. The movie presents a very strong wall of argumentation as to what women can do for their country and countrymen. With respect to the film industry, it is very interesting to note that in this film Chinese people are not represented as a miserable nation waiting to be rescued by Americans. It clearly showed that Chinese are responsible for themselves. Historically, that is very important for them because they are finally recognized. Their strength as a nation and their ability to fight for their motherland is acknowledged. To compare it with the two other films Shanghai Express and Daughter of the Dragon, I would say that this one has more depth in it. It does not speak of lovers who are about to be re-united or smugglers being chased a greater cause is being exposed that is to show the emerging role of women in the society and the magnanimity of other countries aside from the United States. It recognizes the bright and victorious Asian heritages that exist but are seldom granted recognition.

The last movie is King of Chinatown shown in 1939. This rekindles the attitude of Chinese people to be little emperors. They are very fond of being little emperors or bosses who are regarded as kings of a certain area. Even in the United States, little emperors are on the rise. And this is the story of Dr. Mary Ling, a doctor who with her father Dr. Chang Ling was like little policemen who were after the villains. The film does not stir much effect on me, except that it is very surprising to find Anna May Wong in a 1939 film as the lead actress and not playing the role of a Chinese princess waiting to be rescued. I find it very similar with Daughter of the Dragon because of the fact that it is a story that revolves with a father-daughter theme. I think part of the reason of this is because patriarchy is rampant everywhere and therefore if she is not a princess waiting to be rescued, a father figure needs to be in the picture to create balance as women may be too empowered thus creating a stir in the male-dominated society.

All in all, Anna May Wong was successful in redefining and changing the stereotypes. I would say that her roles were very brave, considering that they were all filmed in the 1930s. I cannot fully appreciate the courageousness of putting an Asian female in a movie as lead actress with a rather new plot because I did not live in her time, nonetheless I still would like to believe that Anna May Wong did more than changing the stereotypes of her own roles, she greatly contributed in opening the eyes of people especially movie makers and movie goers. She opened up various doors for future generations of Asian actresses and more than that she has begun to show what women can do for the society, whether in film or in real life.

Capitalism A Love Affair

What is the price that America pays for its love of capitalism In Michael Moores film, Capitalism A Love Affair illustrates the lives of ordinary people in America suffering from starvation, finding a job and a home, and a living in a wealthy nation. The perception of balance always applies even in the system of capitalism. Corporate dominance does have disastrous impacts over the lives of ordinary Americans. In the film, Moores exemplifies the countrys love affair with the capitalist system, i.e. Goldman Sachs and Citigroup, and the downside of this system specifically where airline pilots are underpaid, corporations profiting from the death of their workers, and interest-rate-gouged citizens paid to move their own stuffs so that the bank can resell their home.

The documentary highlights Fahrenheit 911 where Moore demonstrates how innocent people suffer from the hands of greedy few and the negative effects corruption in their living. In the film, 250 people who were laid off from their company (without their earnings) decided to strike back and stage a sit-in. They remain at the plant, day after day, unwilling to leave without their pay. From this incidence, they become empowered in exchange that they will never get back to their jobs, friends at work, trust, income, and a sense of security. Their camaraderie enables them to unite and strike back.
 
In a typical capitalist set-up, huge banks and hedge funds dominate the economic arena of a country where only a few is benefited and many are deprived. Thousands of experience professionals are being laid off to maintain large profits of private companiesinvestorscapitalist. Moore also illustrates the uncomfortably close relationship between banks and politicians in the United States. This only indirectly implies that policy making and regulation are most likely changed and favored among the few on Wall street than many on the Main street.

In an interview made by Moore with a priest says that capitalism is an anti-Christian in a way on which it only favors the few and fails to protect the many. The two hour movie concludes capitalism is a necessary evil and regulating an evil is hardly difficult. The film tracks a group of factory workers who stage a sit-in at a Chicago glass factory when their proprietor stop paying their salaries and who eventually prevail over the bank. Also, a lending company repossesses the home of a group of citizens with the aid of police, forcing them to leave their home. With these undersized examples, the film shows the negative impacts of capitalism among the ordinary and small people not only in the United States but also around the globe (with capitalism as their primary system of their economy). Among the negative effects of capitalism are financial crisis (i.e. economic depression experienced in the United States in the first quarter of 2009), the problem of power, and the problem of restraint. The insecurity of illusion among capitalist countries creates an imbalance of power and of financial stability between well-off and underprivileged people. The level of satisfaction between the high class and low class society in the United States differ in terms of types of food they eat, recreational activities they wanted, and (generally) the type of living they lived. On the macro level, the economic status in a free enterprise like capitalism would be healthy and growing. But looking into the situations of the people working in private companies such as laborers, contractors, and professionals, they received less than what their employers paid for, plus deductions from taxes and other payables taken from their salaries. In general, the economy is growing in a capitalist country but also has drawbacks among the lives of non-capitalist. In my personal view, capitalism is an unjust system that should be abandoned. I agree with Michael Moores argument for which living in a capitalist environment creates pressure on people working for their family, competition among capitalist and non-capitalist, and inequality among different classes of people.

The strong grip of capitalist to the people holding an office in the government generates a problem in a capitalist-based set-up like the United States. There exist the problem of power for which the politicians only runs for an office not because they really want to govern but for the reasons that they can avail the privilege of controlling the actions, affect the income and property of other persons, to hold power, influence, and wealth of the government through corruption. The link between government officials and capitalist do have major implications to the policies created and regulated in the society. Specifically, this will dictate what business establishments will be permitted, types of jobs that would be available to the people, rate of salaries, and lastly, the economic growth of the country.

In a situation where only a few firms shares a typical industry like oil, prices of their products as well as the wages of their employees is highly affected by the policies implemented by the government. The monopoly of these products affect (if not) all the goods and services in the country. Oil as a requisite in transportation have an effect on the prices of wet goods such as rice, meat, vegetables, of dry goods such as clothings and appliances, and services like shipping. As a result, the underprivileged people are again affected with the unjust prices that these firms place in their products.

Moore suggested that the economy of the United States does not work at its highest efficiency where incentives do not reward to the employees but rewards the capitalist instead in terms of profit. The government does not have control among capitalist but do have the power (only) to regulate them. Capitalist evidently control the decisions affecting the wealth and livelihood of others.

Some of the most effective and remembered scenarios in the film is where Moore illustrates how President Ronald Reagan dismantled the United States industrial infrastructure. Also, the recent trillion dollar bailout for multinational banks and corporations, i.e. AIG was shown in the film. The exponential increase in size and intensity among corporate scandals such as SL crisis, subprime mortgages,Bear Stearns, Lehman, Enron,and AIG proves social pathology  an epidemic of self-serving materialism that corrupts the economic system of the country. These scenarios are compounded with depredations cause by excessive profiteering and consumerism for which, does not follows our ethical and religious teachings.  

Moore explains how capitalism could be an anti-American and anti-Christian. In the long run, capitalism is self-destructive. Among the mega market-players who targeted the political system of the country to buy favorable legislation, multi-national corporations who influences and instigate policies by throwing billions of dollars into the policy makerslegislators. In effect, our government most of the times only served these corporate than the majority of the Americans. The current health care system is one example where insurance companies, pharmaceuticals, and industry lobbyists hold control to the policies and regulations regarding to medical health care system of the country. In the current health care system, doctors are poorly paid, some patients are mistreated, poor services and facilities are rendered. Around 963 million dollars are spent by these major players to the members of the Congress for guaranteed policies that will profit them. Consequently, no significant health care reform was made in the past decade.  Moore stresses the importance of health care as leveled to the importance of education in a country. He also stresses the necessity for a major health reform operating at a lower cost, produces better health statistics and covers every American citizen in the country. In comparison to other countries like England, its National Health services provides healthcare to every citizen of England free of charge.
 
Few courses of policy have been undertaken more seriously and with a greater sense of guiltiness. In the case of the United States, one can scarcely imagine its Federal government to act which, on the record, has produced more beneficent results in practice in which less pride has been taken. Specifically, in the case of health care system, all measures have (until recently) been characterized as emergency legislation. Medical insurance, therapies, and consultation fees are being commissioned by the government officials. Most of the Americans consult to a doctor only when they experienced severe pain in their illnesses and most of the times are not treated successfully.

The role of decentralized decision in countries with high living standards like the United States is admirably illustrated by the Scandinavian countries. In the case of the United Kingdom, the depth of the commitment of British workers to some form of central planning is not open to question nor is the sincerity of their leaders. No other country than Britain (not even in Russia), was capitalism more thoroughly defeated as an idea among a voting majority of the people. It soon became evident that the rate at which industries would be taken into public ownership would be determined primarily by public administrative considerations. An increasing appreciation of the level and complexity of the administrative modernization required not only slowed the pace of nationalization but also, it would appear, tempered the enthusiasm of British socialists for the policy itself.

Capitalism is not the only system that will carry the economy of the United States. In any economic system one country utilizes, there are upsides and downsides of each of these systems (e.g. socialism, utilitarianism, and communism). One country must carefully analyze and evaluate which system will be more advantageous in their environment considering their kind of living, customs and traditions, and how their people will respond.  
Stanley Kubrick has become one of the best-known film makers of his generation because of the subject matters he chooses and his unique film style. Kubrick masterfully incorporates the use of music and sound, along with lighting or color, into shots that tell the viewer details about the characters and the story by the way the shot is framed or the movement of the camera. Kubricks combinations of these elements have led to some legendary films that were considered groundbreaking at their inception and have been often imitated since. Two such examples of Kubricks unique style of filmmaking are Full Metal Jacket and The Shining. The stories in each film are vastly different from one another, yet Kubricks signature has been clearly left on each.

Full Metal Jacket is the story of young Marine recruits during the time of the Vietnam War. The film takes place in two parts, with the first being the preparatory experiences of the recruits in boot camp and the second being the actual experiences of two recruits, Joker and Cowboy, in the war. The two halves of the film are made distinctive by the way that each begins. The overall theme of the film is capturing the real experiences that thousands of recruits faced graduating from boot camp and being shipped to Vietnam to fight in the war. The sudden shift from one half to the other conveys this sense of culture shock and suddenness.

The film begins with the recruits being yelled at and commanded by Gunnery Sergeant Hartmann, the instructor that leads them through boot camp. This sudden explosion of loud yelling and orders makes the viewer feel like the recruits must have felt, and Kubrick chose a former Marine to help convey this feeling. According to HistoryInFilm.com, R. Lee Ermey, who plays Senior Drill Instructor Gunnery Sgt. Hartman, was originally the Technical Advisor for the film. Since he had really been a Marine DI, Stanley Kubrick asked him to give an example of how an SDI would talk to a new platoon of recruits. After some minutes of non-stop invectives without repeating himself, Kubrick was so impressed that he hired Ermey on the spot to play the role on screen. And, the sample dialogue was incorporated into the script. Kubrick shows how the Marines desensitize recruits and take away their individual senses of identity to make them work as a team and for the good of the Marine Corps instead of their own personal benefit. One way that he does this is through Hartmanns distribution of nicknames based on his first impressions of the recruits. One recruit is named Joker because he admits to telling a joke when Hartmanns back is turned, another is called Cowboy just because hes from Texas, and a third is given the new name Pyle because Hartmann feels that he looks like Gomer Pyle from television. None of the recruits show any resistance to being renamed and address each other with their given nicknames for the rest of the film, adopting their new names as their only form of individual identity.

Kubrick also displays the unity instilled in the Marine recruits in boot camp with the setup of several shots during the first half of the film. There are repeated shots of the recruits during drills and physical training, or PT, moving and maneuvering as one single unit. They dress alike so they blend in, they yell cadences together, and they move as one. The recruit barracks are used in several shots to frame the recruits in sameness and convey the sense of routine and lack of individuality. The shot is often pulled back so far that the individual identities of the recruits cant be determined and the only figure identifiable is Hartmann because of his hat and his voice. The bunks and footlockers in the barracks are the same for each recruit, and Hartmann includes a drill for them to all climb into their bunks with their rifles at the same time and recite the same prayer to their rifle. Though they are taught that they are to work as a unit, Hartman also teaches them that their only real friend and companion is their rifle. They each give their rifle a name and are taught to revere it as sacred. This framing can be seen during bunk inspections when the rows of bunks are used to emphasize each recruit standing at the end as Hartmann goes down the line and assesses each of them. One of the most significant examples of Kubricks use of framing a shot in the barracks is when Pyle gets caught eating food outside the mess hall. Hartmann makes him stand on his footlocker in the center of the aisle while the other recruits do push ups to his left and right in the bunk rows as punishment for his infraction. This serves to illustrate the unity of the unit and the way that Pyle stands out from the rest and doesnt fit in. He looks down at the other recruits as they exercise below him, and the close up shot of his face emphasizes his isolation as much as his physical placement in the room does.

The character of Pyle is set apart from the other recruits. Kubrick does this in several ways, particularly in regards to his relationship with Joker. When Joker becomes squad leader he takes Pyle under his wing and begins to show him all the basics that Pyle is struggling with, like cleaning his rifle, maneuvering it during drills and finishing the PT obstacle course. In the scenes where Joker helps Pyle there is no yelling from Hartmann or marching cadence, and the two are set against bright blue skies and green grass that stands in sharp contrast to their uniforms. This conveys a bond between the two and a sense of peace and belonging that Pyle is given when Joker becomes his friend. Though they become friends, it is still apparent through Hartmanns treatment that they are two very different soldiers. Zivah Perel states that, Kubricks focusing of his narrative so explicitly on Privates Pyle and Joker and their vastly different experiences adapting to the Corps asserts that it is these mens individual identities that shape the Marines they will become and the Corps as a whole. In other words, Kubrick focuses on these two characters to emphasize how the instruction towards Corps unity can affect individual personalities, and how it can either enhance or destroy a soldier based on the individual identity they are taught to discard.

Pyles transformation and descent is one of the most moving elements of the film and stays with the viewer until the end, though it happens in the films first half. Kubrick emphasizes Pyles transformations with a series of close-up shots that show the changing emotions clearly on his face. Kubrick repeatedly closes in on Pyles eyes, which have become heavy and ominous, and his smile, which has gone from being a carefree innocent smile to one that suggests anger or madness. When Joker finds Pyle in the latrine with his rifle, the viewer experiences another Kubrick trademark when the meaning of the films title is revealed in Pyles answer  to Jokers question about whether the rounds in his rifle are live Seven six two millimeter. Fullmetaljacket. The movies title might have been a mystery to non-military viewers before, but Pyle leaves no question about its meaning in his answer. He has a scary grin on his face and looks up at Joker while his head is lowered towards his rifle. This is a pivotal scene in the film because the underlying meaning of its title is revealed as part of the plot and also because it is a significant turning point for the films main characters. Here, the first half of the film is ended with the suicide of Pyle, the murder of Hartman, and Jokers graduation from boot camp.

Kubrick emphasizes through the whole film that the Marine boot camp has been intended to turn the recruits into hardened, desensitized killing machines. This ethic is humanized with the characters of Joker and Cowboy, but it is made very clear with Hartmann and later with the character of Mother. The Columbia Encyclopedia described Kubricks films as ones that portray a deeply flawed humanity and his characterization of Joker and the other soldiers conveys this message. There is an underlying theme that they are killing machines as Marines and they are even told by Hartman that God wants them to be killers to supply Him with fresh souls. But Jokers juxtaposition of a peace sign button on his jacket with the motto, Born to Kill written on his helmet conveys a sense of humanity in the soldiers that is evident in the way they look out for one another. A poster for the film bore the slogan, Vietnam can kill me but it cant make me care, yet Kubrick emphasizes how the soldiers do just that. Joker has the opportunity to kill a Vietnamese sniper but pauses, considering the consequences of his action. The scene is composed of close-up shots alternating between Jokers face and that of the sniper who is whispering, Shoot me over and over again, but the viewer is left to draw their own conclusions about whether Jokers decision was humane or just that of a killing machine.

Kubricks film, The Shining deals with evil of the supernatural kind instead of the inherent human kind that is confronted in Full Metal Jacket. As in the previous film, the movies title references a seemingly benign element that becomes malevolent when confronted with insanity. Here, in the title, the shining represents the disturbing telepathic powers unleashed by the next major technological epic, the electric age (visual-memory.co.uk). Jack Torrance, his wife Wendy, and his telepathic son Danny move into a mountain resort where Jack intends to work as a caretaker over the winter. The film reveals Jacks descent into madness after being infected with whatever supernatural evil resides in the building. The source of the evil is never fully revealed, though there is foreshadowing in the details about the land being an old Indian burial ground and Jack having a past history with unexpected violence towards Danny. There is also foreshadowing detail in the telling of the fate of the last groundskeeper, who, like Jack, moved his family into the hotel to look after it for the winter and eventually killed his wife and daughters with an axe before shooting himself. The extent of foreshadowing in this film is much more than in Full Metal Jacket Kubrick perhaps included these extra details to help explain some of the abstract images he inserted into scenes of dialogue and reaction that were also not present in the other film.

The theme of isolation is present in both films. Here, it is conveyed physically with broad shots in which the camera takes in the single winding road with the Torrances car driving along alone, set against huge mountainsides and wide open skies. The hotel accomplishes a similar effect, with the three main characters seeming to be swallowed up in its rooms thanks to wide shots from high angles above them. Continuous shots out the windows into the great white expanses of snowy mountains indicate the characters feelings of isolation. The young boy Danny feels the individual isolation that is similar to that felt by Pyle. Danny is identified as being different from the beginning of the film with the presence of Tony, his imaginary friend, and his talents for telepathy. Danny is often left alone in the hotel to his own devices. Danny initially relishes being able to explore the huge building and shots of him running and riding his tricycle through its long hallways are initially shot at his level and with the camera following his movements to convey a sense of childlike curiosity. But as Danny begins to see the ghosts of the murdered little girls and have visions of huge waves of blood, the shots change to angles above him, feeling ominous and oppressive. There are several shots of Danny where he is framed in several doorways, making the hotel seem to loom over him dangerously and conveying Dannys vulnerability.

In a similar fashion are the setups of the shots featuring Jack writing at his typewriter. Kubrick conveys to the viewer that Jack is being both mentally and physically taken over by the force in the hotel by including shots of him appearing very small in the scope of the huge room. There are expansive decorated floors, tall ceilings, winding staircases, and giant windows, and Jack appears very small against all of them. It is as though the hotel has engulfed Jack, and his behavior soon reveals that it has. This angle technique is used repeatedly throughout the film and succeeds in making the viewer experience both the isolation and the disorientation that can happen in such a large and unfamiliar place. It also serves to make the sudden appearance of violent or disturbing images, like the little ghost girls, the wave of blood, and the butchered butler all the more startling.

Jacks breakdown clearly juxtaposes that of Pyle, and Kubrick used similar techniques to convey the descent into madness for each. The two actors portraying the characters manage frighteningly similar facial expressions in their pivotal final scenes, and for this reason, along with Kubricks unique shot setup in each instance, each scene has become memorable and instantly recognizable to viewers. Pyle stares at Joker and smiles malevolently before shouting the rifle prayer taught to all the recruits before shooting Hartmann and then himself. This scene is remembered for the rifle prayer and also for the shocking effect of Pyles blood spraying on the white latrine tiles. This color technique and the full-frontal shot that Kubrick uses to capture the suicide make the scene shocking, forcing the viewer to confront it. This scene parallels that of Jack breaking down the door in The Shining when he looks through with an equally malevolent expression and yells, Heres Johnny His murderous intent makes this famous talk-show line into one of chilling finality, and it is arguably the most famous scene from the film. Kubrick makes it more effective by alternating shots between Jack on one side of the door, intent on breaking it down, and his wife on the other side, sobbing and terrified. This parallel scene echoes that of Joker and the sniper.

The source of the evil is never fully revealed, nor is the ending of the film. According to the Warner Brothers website for the film, Kubrick himself never gave a definitive answer, preferring to let audiences decide for themselves. It also plays on the theme that Evil has always existed and always will. The viewer never definitively knows what happened to Wendy and Jack or if the hotel claims any other victims. In a similar fashion, the fate of Joker and his fellow soldiers is never revealed. The viewer of course can learn what happened to end the Vietnam War, but it is the individual soldiers that one remembers and what happens to them is left to the viewer to speculate. Kubrick did not end all of his films with this open-ended lack of final conclusion, but there is a definite sense in each of these two examples that he intended for the viewer to ponder the possible outcomes and draw their own conclusions. In this way Kubrick empowers the viewer. They are allowed to imagine the killing of the former caretaker of the Overlook Hotel, because while the quick shots of the little girls and the blood indicate violence they dont paint a full picture. That is the responsibility of the viewers mind, just as it is to imagine what it was like for Jack to freeze to death, insane and abandoned, or what it was like for Joker to try to survive with death all around him. In this way Kubrick achieves true mastery of film because he leaves the film in the viewers mind after it ends.

American Sign Language

The movie entitled Children of a lesser God which was shown in 1986 is a film about a deaf school custodian, Sarah and a school teacher, John, who fell in love with her and did his best to help Sarah utter words. Directed by Randa Haines, the movie was adapted by Mark Medoff from his play of the same title which won a Tony Award. The play ran from 1980 to 1982 in Broadway.

I grew up in a society where handicapped people are treated as if they cannot do things on their own. Some people treat them as if they are lesser than them and often times maltreat them. Just like in the movie Children of a lesser God, Sarah was molested when she was younger thus resulting to her being wary of Johns intention to her.

I was amazed because the deaf society in the movie were doing their very best to learn how to communicate to others properly. Their disabilities did not stop them from pursuing their dreams of achieving honors. The deaf students in the movie also made the people see that they share the same right just like those who are not handicapped. Despite the fact that are hearing impaired, they are still seeking their roles in society.

Teaching deaf people how to speak may seem futile for some people. However, the movie showed us that impairments should never be a hindrance if you want to learn something. I admire the deaf peoples courage and perseverance. Unlike those other people who have the resources and health to do something for themselves but they just let opportunities pass by.

Children of a lesser God should be watched by people who are losing hope and people who do nothing to achieve their dreams. Indeed the deaf society in this film serves as a great inspiration to everyone. It proves that disabilities should never stop somebody from dreaming.